As a factor which may have the most important bearing on her young life, Deirdre’s birth family are hardly ever mentioned. The profound lack of expository description about her parents, extended family, schoolmates and childhood history is highly conspicuous. Though all of what little we do receive comes from Deirdre herself– no other sources are ever consulted or even mentioned– so much of the scant detail is negative that we may draw one or both of only two conclusions. One is that she bears too much resentment to ever dwell upon her family again, a rather severe and somewhat tragic attitude. The other is that nothing that happened before the starting date of her narrative (13 January 2000) is important enough to merit her telling.
Any exposition into her past occurs almost exclusively in the first chapter, appropriately entitled Farewell, and a little at the very end of the book. All of this is given in the dispassionate coldness typical of a teenager moved so far past anger as to have become detached, emotionally and geographically, from the childhood home.
This resolute negativity is revealed in the second sentence of the book, in which the narrator refers to her parents, who may well be worried sick over her, as merely They. By the next paragraph she is criticising her often-absent father and morally-ambiguous mother, justifying her decision to separate herself from them, leaving the reader to conclude that only a case of emotional abandonment, of which we hear only from the child’s side, has fomented the running-away.
Clearly Deirdre has not enjoyed a happy teenager’s healthy relationship with a doting father. But her criticism of her mother is more detailed and more telling. From the first she compares herself, acknowledging all her own teenaged imperfection and immaturity, to a mother whom she believes ought to have known better:
I think a girl always wants to look up to her mother; and when she finds the mother doesn’t have much more moral backbone than an immature teenager without a curfew, it’s pretty disappointing. (I, 1, p.2)
But she is humbled and disappointed when her efforts to impress her fail:
I thought by appearing and acting polite, modest, a little humble, even a little prudish, my mother would see I’d become what she’d wanted me to be and that she’d recognise and take the example. So much for that idea. (I, 1, p.2)
Deirdre laments having been left alone, both without siblings and without the attention and advice of her her parents, but she is quick to derive some strength from her situation and indicates that she has attempted to use it to her advantage in the past. Her statement early in the book forms part of what may be termed, on a literary level, her apology or explanation for leaving:
I’d never been one to insist on a lot of attention– growing up as an only child of two professional parents I’d always been able to entertain or occupy myself. There were times when I hadn’t wanted to feel so alone; but I got used to it and I can say with no unfair pride that I’d done okay in spite of it all. It was just that life in that house, with those two lying, cheating, faking, making fools of themselves as well as of me, had got to me. By the time of my fifteenth birthday I’d had it. (I, 1, p.2)
By degrees she arrives at the idea of blaming her parents’ jobs for keeping them so preoccupied as to remove them from their daughter’s life. She reports that rarely were they both home at the same time and condemns them for using their careers as an excuse to stay out of the house (I, 1, p.2). Through her parents’ examples she formulates her own philosophy about the balance between professional and personal life, so sagaciously stated:
I’d come to hate the idea of work like that, an ‘occupation’, you know, the kind of thing you do every day because it’s your life. To me the idea is exactly the opposite– you use the job to support what you want to do; and for adults that’s supposed to mean taking care of your family. (I, 1, p.2)
She will carry this lookout on life with her throughout the book (and throughout the series).
Deirdre schedules her departure for as soon as practical after the new year and cites an example of her parents’ near-perfect neglect of her; apparently they both have plans which take them away from the house leaving her no way to attend a New Year’s Eve party herself (I, 1, p.4). But in what is to become characteristic of her aplomb and resiliency, she steels herself, acknowledging the challenge before her, and is able to cull together her own skills and assets, prime amongst which is having cash:
I’d saved $400 from last summer at the ice-cream stand and with all my birthday money and savings bonds and stuff that guilty family members liked to give me I had over $1300 in the bank as it was. (I, 1, p.4)
We do not have any indication that Deirdre has ever been deceitful of duplicitous with her parents before; indeed she frequently depicts herself as having been a model child. But buoyed by her new resolve she will play on their disinterest in making her departure, specifically by deliberately providing only vague information about her weekend plans, which they do not investigate (I, 1, p.4). She already knows both parents will be concerned more about their own freedoms than about the welfare of their child (I, 1, p.5); and so she is able to effect an escape and survive four days of liberty– for so we must conclude– without being suspected in the least.
Deirdre seems to take a maudlin sense of pride in the knowledge that she will eventually be missed and, as a teenaged runaway, assumed to be lost in some sad or sinister lifestyle (I, 1, p.5). Readily she blames her both parents, apportioning the blame for the loss of their only child to only them:
And that would rightfully be so. The fault was theirs. In doing what I’d do I’d only be acting in my own interests– self-preservation, self-actualisation, anything with ‘self’ in front of it. It was just time for myself. (I, 1, p.5)
We see little of her own school life in the beginning, receiving more of Deirdre’s observations about it over the course of the book. The scene in which she sits down in the cafeteria is exquisitely poignant, as Deirdre complains of a stomachache and watches her classmates prattle on ‘like the happy children they really were.’ (I, 1, p.5) She is already alone, as she knows that she cannot give even a hint about what is to happen to her, and sadly acknowledges that she will never see her friends again. Though she will not admit to missing them over the course of the book, we must conclude she feels something about having to confront an early end of her secondary-school experience.
As to corroborating witnesses to Deirdre’s family and school life we have only one, of whom is given almost nothing. On Deirdre’s last day at school her classmate Sharon Hill, whom Deirdre refers to as a ‘little chatterbox’ (I, 1, p.5) leans over during prep and enquires about a book Deirdre is reading. Deirdre at once proffers a lie and then comments that ‘Lies can come in handy sometimes’ (I, 1, p.7) with the offhanded air of a seasoned confidence artiste. Sharon has the same teacher for her own literature course and ought to have known that what Deirdre reads was not an assigned text; but true to Deirdre’s assessment of her Sharon apparently never suspects: ‘Sharon Hill was a twit and would believe anything you told her.’ (I, 1, p.8) It is a judgement brought about by Deirdre’s need to have done with the association rather than by a sincere assessment of her friend’s character.
Perhaps her first twinge of regret, albeit without any hint of a change of heart, occurs within an hour or so of her imminent departure, as she begins to come to terms with what she must leave behind:
School was never very difficult for me and I truly wonder why so many people think it’s so awful. Most of them should instead count their blessings that they even have a home life that lets them attend it. (I, 1, p.7)
We get the idea that she has never truly disliked school; indeed it has probably been the one facet of her life that she has accepted as a constant, positive influence upon her life. At school she has been only a normal student, easily making friends, fitting cheerfully into a society, earning respectable grades and meriting her teachers’ respect. We imagine her offering constructive debate in classroom discussion, displaying competitive assertiveness in PE exercises, and laughing merrily with her peers’ antics and jokes. Deirdre may be above-average intellectually or academically, not only because of her precocious thought processes but down to her ability to see the relative values of staying in a safe though loveless home situation for the promise of something more for the future and of embarking on an independent life to realise self-fulfilment in spite of inevitable risks, the likes of which she has not yet even imagined. Indeed this conflict, and her reasons for her decision, are the core theme of the whole story.
From the time she gets on the bus as Falls Road through the end of the book there are few mentions of her family at all. Her undoubtedly worried parents are occasionally referred to as ‘they’ but conspicuously Deirdre never refers to her parents’ household as ‘home’ at all. One very telling comment occurs when she meets Rick at the gift shop on Grand Bahama and he asks her where she lives:
‘Where are you staying?’ he asked me.I decided to be honest. ‘Right now?’‘Yeah.’‘Right here.’ (V, 1, p.156)
But she has already concluded that this is the bed she has made for herself when, just before, she reconciles her profound sense of both freedom and need in her own mind:
What did it matter how long it’d be? –this was my life now. Wherever I was was where I lived. (V, 1, p.156)
One of Deirdre’s more poignant realisations about her sense of home appears in the section about the small deserted island in the Bahama Bank, when she lies down completely naked like an innocent child on the wide-open beach of the island’s west end:
It was still spooky; but I’d grown used to the sound and feel of the place and wasn’t going to worry about it. I actually dozed off for a while, curled up on my side on the sand with my head on my arm as though happily at home in a soft, cosy bed. (VI, 3, p.226)
This is sad because a safe, cosy bed of her own is precisely what she lacks. Only later, at the Pyfrom Road apartment in Nassau, does she achieve anything like a true semblance of ‘home’ in her own mind, where physical security, emotional and intellectual peace of mind, and a soft cosy bed are all hers at the same time and with no finite deadline looming after which she must change lodgings. At all other times she is keenly aware that in leaving her parents’ house for ever she has given over the most fundamental comforts of home.
Of course Deirdre is certainly guilty of a certain conceit about her own abilities and even a right to live her own life. But though she stubbornly refuses to acknowledge anything but her own efforts in making her own way in the world, she is not devoid of conscience. Even after becoming happily ensconced in a remarkably safe, productive and respectable career as a nanny to little Jennifer Clark, she is unable to completely escape her past.
I wondered about being a real role model for little Jennifer. Deep inside I sensed that I’d done the worst thing any child could do, leaving my parents and letting them imagine my horrible fate. And I paid for it; I’d begun to have nightmares. They were always about being caught, sometimes by the Bahamians and sometimes by the Americans and sometimes even by pirates or drug dealers, and always I was badly treated in some kind of prison and then sent home to face my parents and Dearborn High School and all the people there all over again. No– that’s what made it worst. I’d been carving a new life for myself, and I was proud of it; and it was too far past the point of no return now. (III, 3, p.109)
This is a pure first-person narrative and so we never see Deirdre’s parents’ responses to her decision and are never given any idea of what they thought of her or how they treated her before she left home. Having no alternate points of view we must accept Deirdre’s point of view about her parents and align our attitudes about them with hers. The story works only if we agree that her parents were unfit, self-centred, irresponsible and morally (and religiously) hypocritical; and indeed we have no other information about them to pose in argument to that so it is just as well that we take her at her word.
The paragraph immediately following the above excerpt gives us some insight. If Deirdre provides the only point of view we have about her parents, she is also the one who should know them best. Her condemnations of them, if tinged with a disillusioned teenager’s ire, are at least colourful enough for us to accept that she really has legitimate differences with them and has seen no other way to salvage her own self-worth and self-determination than to do as she has done. But she cannot deny that in escaping her own distress she may have caused distress for others.
Sometimes I imagined my parents might’ve been going crazy back there– I hadn’t even left a note– and I was sure the police had been rung and there were APBs out and my face was showing up on milk cartons and ‘missing child’ reports on Channel 26. But the truth was probably the opposite. They’d probably filed for divorce immediately and were breathing sighs of relief that they wouldn’t have to carry on the charade of being good parents. My mother would make the house an afternoon oasis for sex-starved married men and my father would take a cosy bachelor flat with some young ‘administrative assistant’ in satin underwear; and it’d be rollicking good fun for them both. In time I’d be a distant memory to them, a face in a photo on the buffet–‘Who is that?’ some visitor might say.‘A daughter I once had; but I haven’t seen her in a long time.’ (III, 3, pp.109-110)
Early on, she explores the idea to write to her cousin Maura, who is of the same age and obviously a bit of a sister figure for her. Maura is the only family member she thinks about; indeed she will maintain a relationship with her, albeit only one-sided, through the writing of letters. The effort is probably taken out of a sense of guilt, though with Deirdre the element of pride, in the form of gloating about her new-founded freedom and not-inconsequential degree of success, can never be discounted. But the venture is not without risk, which she determines to take into account.
Maura wasn’t that bright and I couldn’t jeopardise my current situation in case she was not as discreet as I hoped. There would never be, after all, any opportunity for her or anyone else to contact me. I could only inform her, never use her for true two-way communication. (III, 3, p.104)
The ruse is less to apprise a childhood friend of the details of her exciting journey as it is to use her as a conduit to her parents; for Deirdre must suspect that any contact she might make to any member of her family will be made known to her parents and, almost certainly, to whatever agencies may be searching for her as a runaway teenager. So she will remain guarded, providing only vague information about places and dates and posting the sealed envelopes inside those to trusted friends who then post them from home towns in other locations, leaving only the least reliable of traces as to Deirdre’s true whereabouts.
Still, she never takes her continued freedom for granted and ascribes to her parents all the overbearing authority and power to conclude her escapade and to condemn her to misery, a fate from which she is helpless to extricate herself:
I had a dream that night that the FBI had found me and were about to deport me. Mrs Clark and little Jennifer, and Tumblebunch, and I think Noah from the boat, all stood in the rain and waved good-bye to me as I was put into a taxi to be taken back to Connecticut. I remember calling out to them, ‘All I have is what I have.’ (IV, 1, p.120)
When Deirdre takes the job as an exotic dancer she must surely be aware that, to her parents who, though selfishly and unacceptably neglectful of a child they have been, are hardly entirely evil people, it would seem like a deliberate slap in the face that defies all they may have expected of her. But we are never assured that her parents ever expected anything of her at all. In any event Deirdre is able to meet the requirements of such a job with an admirable sense of dignity, upholding a firm sense of what she will and will not do in order to cut her own way through the world. Her moral compass, then, whatever the profession in which it is applied, is essentially virtuous, even to parents such as her own. If a daughter is required by circumstances to accept such a job, this one will perform it only by her own standards, holding herself somewhat above the seedier side of the society she must keep and never forgetting that the considerable income is her principal reason for taking it; and surely, in that, her parents cannot be too disappointed.
If Deirdre the runaway is the product of her parents’ influence, she must have learnt something; for despite the costs she has developed into a brave, resourceful, intelligent, self-reliant, and essentially ethical young woman of whom any decent parent would be proud. But Deirdre herself feels the influence as a kind of inescapable oppression that still haunts her. She chastises her mother for having inspired her to a degree of self-centred independence at odds with her own long-held expectations of herself. She would prefer a sense of emotional interdependence and shared vulnerability with those she holds dear. But when she hears of her friend Iris’ detainment for having been an underaged dancer like herself, Deirdre feels helpless to help, fearful for compromising her own self-interests:
I had more than enough money to bail her out, if I’d had to– but what if they asked me one or two simple questions? I felt painfully inadequate as a friend.Chalk up another point to being scared and self-serving. See how I have learnt, Mother? (VIII, 1, p.319)
This is the first time we see her address her mother, even appositively, as though her mother is the audience for the narration.
Only at the end of the book do we arrive at the true gist of Deirdre’s differences with her parents. In facing Sandy’s parents’ disapproval of whom their daughter has taken for a friend, Deirdre recognises the same sort of wilful detachment her own parents had towards her.
My parents had never looked deeply at me…. They went about their own ways completely oblivious to anything I felt or did or said. I was an appendage to them, like the baby in a game of dolls or on a television programme, set dressing for their lives as though it would give their own characters depth. (X, 5, p.438)
It is a harsh condemnation; but from Deirdre’s point of view it must have been unspeakably difficult to have spent her formative years essentially overlooked and underappreciated. No-one can survive as her own person by conducting her life as a mere appendage to someone else’s life. A child is not a pet or a toy; and Deirdre’s twofold purpose in running away has been to free herself from this emotional oppression and to demonstrate, to herself and to anyone else who cares, that she is intellectually as well as logistically capable of determining her own fate.
The sense of emptiness Deirdre has felt– indeed, has taken upon herself– is not going to go away soon; but of what Sandy calls ‘noblesse oblige’ (X, 5, p.436), and as an older, wiser woman of the world, she can impart some wisdom to fill the voids in others. In her condemnation of her parents’ view that their child was no more than ‘a car, or a refrigerator, or a window… just one more thing they possessed in their lives’ (X, 5, p.438) is the real plight and plea of the disenfranchised teenager.
This is not merely an adolescent on a whinge about more allowance or a less-stringent curfew. Deirdre’s insights are much deeper than that, even though she may not even have realised that till now. If a confused and misguided kid at the beginning, she has matured into a reasonable, thoughtful creature deserving of our respect and admiration. Nowhere is this more evident than in the unselfish conclusion she draws about her own life and about what’s best for her friend Sandy which serves as the climax of the book:
If parents love, why don’t they care? And, if they don’t care, then is it really love? Is it not possible, that to do what’s best for a child, it might mean that the parents don’t always get what they want? If we do love, truly love, then we really must put the one we love first, even if it means inconvenience for ourselves. Because in the end all that matters is that we do what’s truly best for the people we love the most. (X, 5, p.439)
And thus Deirdre has identified the quest for giving and receiving unconditional love as her own raison d’etre… for better or for worse.
